Table 8-1. Summary
of Major Pulping Processes
|
Treatment
|
Relative Strength*
|
|||||||
|
|
Pulp
|
Form of
|
|
|||||
| Process | Acronym | Chemical | Mechanical |
Yield (%)
|
Wood Used |
Wood
|
Softwood | Hardwood |
|
|
||||||||
|
Mechanical |
||||||||
|
Stone groundwood |
SGW |
None |
Grinder |
93-95 |
Softwood (mostly) |
bolts |
5 |
3 |
|
Pressure groundwood |
PGW |
None |
Grinder |
93-95 |
||||
|
Refiner mechanical |
RMP |
None |
Disk refiner |
93-95 |
Softwood (mostly) |
chips |
5-6 |
3 |
|
(pressure) |
||||||||
|
Thermomechanical |
TMP |
Steam |
Disk refiner |
80-90 |
Softwood |
chips |
6-7 |
- |
|
(pressure) |
||||||||
|
Chemithermomechanical |
CTMP |
Sodium sulfite or |
Disk refiner |
80-90 |
Hardwood |
chips |
- |
5-6 |
|
sodium hydroxidea |
(pressure) |
|||||||
|
Chemimechanicalb |
CMP |
Sodium sulfite or |
Disk refiner |
80-90 |
Hardwood |
chips |
- |
5-6 |
|
sodium hydroxide |
||||||||
|
Semichemical |
||||||||
|
Neutral sulfite |
NSSC |
Sodium sulfite + |
Disk refiner |
70-85 |
Hardwood |
chips |
- |
6 |
|
sodium carbonate |
||||||||
|
Green liquor |
GLSC |
Sodium hydroxide + |
Disk refiner |
70-85 |
||||
|
sodium carbonate |
||||||||
|
Nonsulfur |
|
Sodium carbonate + |
Disk refiner |
70-85 |
||||
|
sodium hydroxide |
||||||||
|
Chemical |
||||||||
|
Kraft |
|
Sodium hydroxide + |
None |
45-55 |
Both |
chips |
10 |
7-8 |
|
sodium sulfide |
||||||||
|
Sulfite |
|
Calcium bisulfite |
None |
40-50 |
Both |
chips |
9 |
7 |
|
in sulfurous acidc,d |
||||||||
|
Magnefite |
|
Magnesium bisulfite |
None |
45-55 |
||||
|
in sulfurous acide |
||||||||
|
Soda |
|
Sodium hydroxide |
None |
40-50 |
Hardwood |
chips |
|
7-8 |
|
Soda-oxygen |
|
Sodium hydroxide + |
None |
45-55 |
Hardwood |
chips |
|
|
|
oxygen |
||||||||
|
Soda-anthraquinone |
SAq |
Sodium hydroxide + |
None |
45-55 |
||||
|
anthraquinone |
||||||||
|
Dissolving |
||||||||
|
Prehydrolysis kraft |
|
Steaming and kraft |
None |
35 |
||||
|
(two-step process) |
||||||||
|
Acid sulfite |
|
Acid sulfite |
None |
35 |
||||
Source: Smook (1986), Young et al. (1989)
*Very "rough" ranking based on
full range of pulp strengths